loader image

Wolfie’s just fine

AI has the potential to automate tasks and displace jobs in the creative industries. There are also ethical concerns about the authenticity and ownership of AI-generated works of art. It's important for artists and creatives to stay informed about AI and engage in discussions about ethical considerations.

Share This Post

AI has the potential to automate tasks and displace jobs in the creative industries. There are also ethical concerns about the authenticity and ownership of AI-generated works of art. It’s important for artists and creatives to stay informed about AI and engage in discussions about ethical considerations. These previous piece of 3 sentences was written by ChatGPT. It’s short, informative and has all the major problems of AI. Or does it? For many this is a simple problem of technocratic ethics. According to many techno-utopianists as an artist, I should “adapt or die”. I think the best answer to this could be a manifesto written back in 1998 by people who called themselves technorealists.
"Principle #1: Technologies are not neutral."

The technology isn’t saint, and we know that it not only creates copies of artwork but also removes watermarks and creates deepfakes.

As I witnessed how fast AI tools are unfolding for the public to use, literally for everything, I found myself thinking, why do people get so excited about it? It seems the main reason is the ease of use and the availability of high-value results. To put it simply, it’s a freebie! Even if the result is clearly a compilation of copyright infringement, it’s a freebie. I would even say that most of the folks who tried Midjourney could say that they have this sort of gut feeling that the result is a bargain. They would never get the same result otherwise, this cheap. So why should artists comply with this? Why should we be complicit?

As for Generative AI, I see how words such as “machine learning” or “training” could create an impression of some sort of personality. People now, in all seriousness, compare it to real artists and how they create their artwork. Generative AI is a collage tool built to be a parasite in the art world. Please be careful when comparing it to real people.

Now, imagine this freebie is being used by a business. Imagine if a business entity hires a collage tool instead of real artists to pitch a game idea. Is there any way to protect these artists? The image above is a set of AI-generated game assets created using Midjourney V.4.

Many different art communities are currently struggling with this ethical conundrum. I really appreciate how artists are standing together for their rights, particularly on ArtStation. Please see the illustrations above that were made in protest of ArtStation’s policy. Artists from all spectrums of creative professional fields are now discussing this issue.

As a very good example of this kind of talk I want to share this one by Stan Prokopenko (Proko), Steven Zapata and Karla Ortiz.

you might also like

GRAPHIC DESIGN

Web design, corporate style, motion design

CONCEPT ART

2D and 3D art for video games

ARTWORK

Illustration for books and games